Sexual diversity in the United States: Results from a nationally
representative probability sample of adult women and men. Debby
Herbenick et al. PLoS One, July 2017,
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0181198
Abstract: In 2015, we conducted a cross-sectional, Internet-based, U.S.
nationally representative probability survey of 2,021 adults (975 men,
1,046 women) focused on a broad range of sexual behaviors. Individuals
invited to participate were from the GfK KnowledgePanel®. The survey was
titled the 2015 Sexual Exploration in America Study and survey
completion took about 12 to 15 minutes. The survey was confidential and
the researchers never had access to respondents’ identifiers.
Respondents reported on demographic items, lifetime and recent sexual
behaviors, and the appeal of 50+ sexual behaviors. Most ( > 80%)
reported lifetime masturbation, vaginal sex, and oral sex. Lifetime anal
sex was reported by 43% of men (insertive) and 37% of women
(receptive). Common lifetime sexual behaviors included wearing sexy
lingerie/underwear (75% women, 26% men), sending/receiving digital
nude/semi-nude photos (54% women, 65% men), reading erotic stories (57%
of participants), public sex (≥43%), role-playing ( ≥ 22%), tying/being
tied up ( ≥ 20%), spanking ( ≥ 30%), and watching sexually explicit
videos/DVDs (60% women, 82% men). Having engaged in threesomes (10%
women, 18% men) and playful whipping ( ≥ 13%) were less common. Lifetime
group sex, sex parties, taking a sexuality class/workshop, and going to
BDSM parties were uncommon (each < 8%). More Americans identified
behaviors as “appealing” than had engaged in them. Romantic/affectionate
behaviors were among those most commonly identified as appealing for
both men and women. The appeal of particular behaviors was associated
with greater odds that the individual had ever engaged in the behavior.
This study contributes to our understanding of more diverse adult sexual
behaviors than has previously been captured in U.S. nationally
representative probability surveys. Implications for sexuality
educators, clinicians, and individuals in the general population are
discussed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete