Is the InterNet killing the movies industry? Do we see progress in
economics but at the same time is cultural expression decaying? Actually, it seems we are doing well:
Growth of US origin features, 2000-2016, as shows by queries to the IMDb. Fig 3.1 [1]
Check also Record Number of Films Produced [2].
Data from UNESCO database shows what the production of quality film was in previous years (I take documentaries as a measure of quality films) [3]. Number of documentary feature films in the UK at the same time the InterNet explodes and cheap cameras make their appearance:
2005 2
2007 9
2008 62
2009 58
2010 55
2011 56
2012 73
2013 44
2014 85
2015 79
To compare, these are the fictional feature films in the UK, according to the same DB:
2005 162
2007 112
2008 215
2009 248
2010 285
2011 239
2012 249
2013 197
2014 253
2015 213
Is greater production worse? Or better? A way to measure quality of all movies, regardless of genre, is Rotten Tomatoes [4]. These are the movies scoring 84+, 1998-2016 (Fig 3.4 [1]):
References
[1] Joel Waldfogel's Digital Reinassance. Princeton: Princeton Univ Press, 2018.
[2] UNESCO, Mar 31 2016, http://uis.unesco.org/en/news/record-number-films-produced
[3] UNESCO data, accessed Jan 2018: data.uis.unesco.org
[4] www.rottentomatoes.com/top
No comments:
Post a Comment