Some authors have proposed that research on cognitive differences is too dangerous to be allowed to proceed unchecked, but knowledge about intelligence differences is not always more harmful than alternative false beliefs

Meisenberg, Gerhard (2019) Should Cognitive Differences Research Be Forbidden? Phil Sci Archive, [Preprint] Jan 2019. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15659/

Abstract: Some authors have proposed that research on cognitive differences is too dangerous to be allowed to proceed unchecked. From a consequentialist perspective, this contribution investigates the usually unstated assumptions about harms and benefits behind these proposals, finding that knowledge about intelligence differences is not always more harmful than alternative false beliefs. The main conclusion is that the proper questions to ask are not about the nature of the research, but about whether prevailing value systems can turn truthful knowledge about the world into benign outcomes. These value systems are the proper focus of action. Therefore, the proposal to suppress knowledge about cognitive ability differences must be based on the argument that people in modern societies are unable to apply such knowledge in benign ways, either because of universal limitations of human nature or because of specific features of modern societies.

Keywords: Intelligence, consequentialism, values, epistocracy