How
squirrels protect their caches: Location, conspicuousness during
caching, and proximity to kin influence cache lifespan. Mikel Maria
Delgado, Lucia F Jacobs. bioRxiv, August 16, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1101/738237
Abstract: Scatter-hoarding animals
cannot physically protect individual caches, and instead utilize
several behavioral strategies that are hypothesized to offer protection
for caches. We validated the use of physically altered, cacheable food
items, and determined that intraspecific pilfering among free-ranging
fox squirrels (N=23) could be assessed in the field. In this study we
were able to identify specific individual squirrels who pilfered or
moved caches that had been stored by a conspecific. We identified a high
level of pilfering (25%) among this population. In a subsequent study,
we assessed the fate of squirrel-made caches. Nineteen fox squirrels
cached 294 hazelnuts with passive integrated transponder tags implanted
in them. Variables collected included assessment and cache investment
and protection behaviors; cache location, substrate, and conspicuousness
of each cache; how long each cache remained in its original location,
and the location where the cache was finally consumed. We also examined
whether assessment or cache protection behaviors were related to the
outcomes of buried nuts. Finally, we measured the population dynamics
and heterogeneity of squirrels in this study, testing the hypothesis
that cache proximity and pilferage tolerance could serve as a form of
kin selection. Polymer chain reaction (PCR) was used to analyze hair
samples and determine relatedness among 15 squirrels, and the potential
impact of relatedness on caching behavior. Results suggested that cache
protection behaviors and the lifespan of a cache were dependent on the
conspicuousness of a cache. Squirrels may mitigate some of the costs of
pilfering by caching closer to the caches of related squirrels than to
those of non-related squirrels.
No comments:
Post a Comment