Brachem, Johannes, Henry Krüdewagen, and York Hagmayer. 2019. “The
Limits of Nudging: Can Descriptive Social Norms Be Used to Reduce Meat
Consumption? It's Probably Not That Easy.” PsyArXiv. September 19.
doi:10.31234/osf.io/xk58q
Abstract: A high level of meat
consumption is associated with high emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG)
and significantly contributes to anthropogenic climate change. One
promising approach to reduce meat consumption without restrictions to
freedom of choice might be the use of descriptive social norms as
nudging interventions. We report two preregistered, randomized
experiments (N1 = 450 and N2 = 899) in which we investigated whether
written displays of true descriptive social norms about the rising
popularity of vegetarian and vegan meals can be used to effectively
nudge people towards more sustainable food choices, i.e. reduced meat
consumption. Additionally, the main effect of subjects’ environmental
attitude and a possible interaction of the social norms intervention and
environmental attitude were examined. Participants were asked to choose
one of five meals in 29 (Exp. 1) and 28 (Exp. 2) trials, resulting in a
total of 38,222 observations. Subjects with a higher environmental
attitude were more likely to choose meat-free meals, OR1 = 3.50, [2.84,
4.32]; OR2 = 2.79, [2.40, 3.23]. The results of both experiments showed
no significant effect of the social norms intervention on subjects’
likelihood to select meat-free meals, OR1 = 0.73, 95% CI [0.49, 1.09];
OR2 = 0.97, [0.81, 1.16], and no interaction of the intervention with
environmental attitude. An exploratory analysis suggested that subjects
chose more meat-free meals if those made up a bigger portion of the
offer. The results are discussed with regard to possible explanations,
including a potentially high context-dependency of the efficacy of
social norms interventions. The data, materials and preregistrations are
available from https://osf.io/ruyfs/.
No comments:
Post a Comment