Rolf Degen summarizing... Tweets about new scientific findings rarely succeed in getting readers to click on the linked sources

How is science clicked on Twitter? Click metrics for Bitly short links to scientific publications. Zhichao Fang  Rodrigo Costas  Wencan Tian  Xianwen Wang  Paul Wouters. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, January 23 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24458

Rolf Degen's take: Tweets about new scientific findings rarely succeed in getting readers to click on the linked sources

Abstract: To provide some context for the potential engagement behavior of Twitter users around science, this article investigates how Bitly short links to scientific publications embedded in scholarly Twitter mentions are clicked on Twitter. Based on the click metrics of over 1.1 million Bitly short links referring to Web of Science (WoS) publications, our results show that around 49.5% of them were not clicked by Twitter users. For those Bitly short links with clicks from Twitter, the majority of their Twitter clicks accumulated within a short period of time after they were first tweeted. Bitly short links to the publications in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities tend to attract more clicks from Twitter over other subject fields. This article also assesses the extent to which Twitter clicks are correlated with some other impact indicators. Twitter clicks are weakly correlated with scholarly impact indicators (WoS citations and Mendeley readers), but moderately correlated to other Twitter engagement indicators (total retweets and total likes). In light of these results, we highlight the importance of paying more attention to the click metrics of URLs in scholarly Twitter mentions, to improve our understanding about the more effective dissemination and reception of science information on Twitter.