Results robustly show that humans across the Globe (25 countries, 6 continents) respond with stronger preferences for dominant leaders when they find themselves in contexts of intergroup conflict

Intergroup Conflict and Preferences for Dominant Leaders: Testing Universal Features of Human Followership Psychology across 25 Countries. Lasse Laustsen, Xiaotian Sheng, Mark van Vugt. Human Behavior & Evolution Society HBES 2021, Jun-Jul 2021. https://www.hbes.com/hbes2021/

Abstract: Research shows that followers exhibit heightened preferences for dominant leaders in situations of intergroup conflict and coalitional competition (e.g. Little et al., 2007; Spisak et al., 2012; Laustsen & Petersen, 2017). Accordingly, humans are theorized to possess an evolved psychology of adaptive followership that flexibly regulates preferences for leader dominance in accordance with levels of intergroup conflict (Laustsen & Petersen, 2015). However, existing research is based exclusively on studies conducted in the US or Western Europe. Consequently, the central claim that the adaptive followership psychology constitutes a human universal remains untested. This project tests if followers across the Globe-spanning 25 countries (across six continents) such as Colombia, Kenya, Pakistan, Hungary and China-hold stronger preferences for dominant leaders during intergroup conflict. Building on existing experimental protocols, subjects we assigned subjects randomly to either an intergroup conflict condition or a no-conflict condition asking them to choose their favored leader from dominant and non-dominant looking alternatives. Results robustly show that humans across the Globe respond with stronger preferences for dominant leaders when they find themselves in contexts of intergroup conflict. Hence, the project provides unique and unprecedented support for the notion of a universal and context sensitive human followership psychology.