Gender-equality paradox (greater social and economic gender equality predicts increased gender differentiation): Authors find given names are more phonetically gendered in more gender-equal societies

The Gender-Equality Paradox and Optimal Distinctiveness: More Gender-Equal Societies Have More Gendered Names. Allon Vishkin, Michael L. Slepian, Adam D. Galinsky. Social Psychological and Personality Science, August 31, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211037576

Abstract: Findings in several domains have documented a gender-equality paradox, where greater social and economic gender equality predicts increased gender differentiation. Many of these findings have used subjective rating scales and thus have been dismissed as artifactual due to different reference groups in more versus less gender-equal societies. Although recent research has documented the gender-equality paradox using an objective criterion—pursuit of degrees in STEM—the robustness of this finding has also been challenged. The current investigation offers evidence for the gender-equality paradox using an objective marker of gender differentiation: baby names. We find given names are more phonetically gendered in more gender-equal societies, with female names being more likely unvoiced (a softer sound) and male names being more likely voiced (a harder sound). We offer a theoretical explanation based on optimal distinctiveness theory to explain why increasing gender equality might motivate a preference for greater gender differentiation.

Keywords: gender, gender equality, stereotypes, optimal distinctiveness theory