Beauty is associated with lower support for redistribution and with a higher likelihood of believing that economic success depends more on individual effort rather than external circumstances

Attractiveness and Preferences for Redistribution. Andrea Fazio. Economics & Human Biology, May 11 2022, 101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101145

Highlights

• We show that beauty is associated with lower support for redistribution and with a higher likelihood of believing that economic success depends more on individual effort rather than external circumstances.

• We also find that attractiveness correlates with voting for the Free Democratic Party (FDP), which historically advocates a low level of taxation.

• The beauty premium in the labor market does not fully explain our results.

• The relationship between beauty and preferences for redistribution might depend on how attractive individuals rationalize the advantages they get thanks to their beauty.

Abstract: Using unique German survey data, we show that beauty is associated with lower support for redistribution and that attractive individuals are more likely to believe that economic success depends more on individual effort rather than external circumstances. These results are consistent with voting behavior, as we find that beauty correlates with voting for the Free Democratic Party (FDP), which historically advocates a low level of taxation. These associations do not differ by gender and remain also if household income and employment status are controlled for, suggesting that the relationship between attractiveness and political preferences is not fully explained by the beauty premium in the labor market. We test alternative channels that might drive our results, but the correlation between attractiveness and preferences for redistribution always persists. We suggest that our results might be explained by the way in which attractive individuals rationalize the advantages they get thanks to their beauty.

JEL: D63D69D72Z1

Keywords: BeautyPolitical PreferencesPreferences for Redistribution

Interpersonal distancing is attentionally demanding and hence vulnerable to unintentional lapses due to inattention: 97pct of all participants reported unintentional lapses due to hyperfocus and spontaneous mind-wandering, inter alia

Brown, Chris R. H., Dr, and Sophie Forster. 2022. “Lapses in the Person Radar: Attentional Traits Predict Difficulty in Interpersonal Distancing.” PsyArXiv. May 11. doi:10.31234/osf.io/2yrfj

Abstract: Within the psychological literature and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the regulation of interpersonal distance has typically been viewed as a voluntary choice, with implications for public health interventions. Here we highlight that lapses in interpersonal distancing can also occur unintentionally. Using a novel measure across 3 undergraduate samples (total N = 1225) we found that almost all (>97%) participants reported unintentional lapses in maintaining interpersonal distance, with 16% experiencing such lapses frequently. Thirty percent of the variance in these reports was accounted for by attentional traits: Inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive ADHD symptoms jointly predicted difficulties with interpersonal distancing, with the former relationship fully mediated by hyperfocus and spontaneous mind-wandering. The results are consistent with a view of interpersonal distancing as attentionally demanding and hence vulnerable to unintentional lapses due to inattention. We discuss the implications for epidemiology, social cognition and functioning, and design of social spaces.

Sex-differentiated components of sexual morality: Women expressed more moral condemnation of short-term sex, and especially transactional sex-for-money exchanges; sexual infidelity more morally condemned by women than by men

Asao, K., Crosby, C. L., & Buss, D. M. (2022). Sexual morality: Multidimensionality and sex differences. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000297

Abstract: Despite the increase in the scientific study of morality over the past decade, one important domain remains relatively underexplored—sexual morality. The current article begins to fill this gap by exploring its multidimensionality and testing several evolution-based hypotheses about sex differences in moralizing distinct components of sexual morality, including incest, sexual coercion, sexual infidelity, and short-term mating. Study 1 (N = 920) and Study 2 (N = 543) tested predictions derived from evolutionary psychological hypotheses and used factor analysis to identify seven core factors of sexual morality separately for male and female actors: infidelity, short-term sex, sexual coercion, outgroup sex, long-term mating, same-sex sexuality, and paraphilic sex. Study 3 (N = 380) provided an independent test of the evolution-based hypotheses and factor structure. Results strongly support sex-differentiated predictions about short-term sex, but not sexual coercion or incest (possibly owing to ceiling effects). Discussion centers around sexual morality as a complex domain not readily explained by more domain-general theories of morality and the necessity of comprehensive theories of morality to include sex-differentiated components in their formulations.

---

Small differences, but women are also more opposed to incest, sexual coercion, paraphilic sex; more approving of outgroup sex and less disapproving of homosexual sex.

“Meating halfway”: Exploring the attitudes of meat eaters, veg*ns, and occasional meat eaters toward those who eat meat and those who do not eat meat

“Meating halfway”: Exploring the attitudes of meat eaters, veg*ns, and occasional meat eaters toward those who eat meat and those who do not eat meat. Sara Pabian et al. The Journal of Social Psychology, May 10 2022. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224545.2022.2074288

Abstract: Empirical studies have persistently reported negative attitudes of meat eaters toward vegetarians and vegans (veg*ns), but scant attention has been paid to veg*ns’ attitudes toward meat eaters. We aimed to investigate the attitudes of meat eaters and veg*ns from both perspectives. In addition, we explored the attitudes of occasional meat eaters. We performed a cross-sectional study (Study 1) among meat eaters, veg*ns, and occasional meat eaters, as well as a content analysis of publicly available tweets (Study 2). Study 1 (N = 477, Mage = 23.45, SD = 5.91) showed that the attitudes of veg*ns toward meat eaters are significantly more negative compared to the attitudes of meat eaters toward veg*ns, but both were lower than the midpoint on scales measuring negative attitudes toward the other. Study 2 showed that only a small portion (<1%) of tweets (N = 1,328) on meat eating or veg*nism contained signs of negative attitudes. The two studies provide little evidence of the existence of strong negative attitudes.

Keywords: Meat eatersoccasional meat eatersattitudesin-group biasintergroup perception veg*ns

Across cultures, women are much higher than men on fearful personality traits. Why? The sex difference in fear is mediated by that in physical strength.

Physical Strength Partly Explains Sex Differences in Trait Anxiety in Young Americans. Nicholas Kerry, Damian R. Murray. Psychological Science, April 2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620971298

Abstract: Among the most consistent sex differences to emerge from personality research is that women score higher than men on the Big Five personality trait Neuroticism. However, there are few functionally coherent explanations for this sex difference. The current studies tested whether this sex difference is due, in part, to variation in physical capital. Two preregistered studies (total N = 878 U.S. students) found that sex differences in the anxiety facet of Neuroticism were mediated by variation in physical strength and self-perceived formidability. Study 1 (N = 374) did not find a predicted mediation effect for overall Neuroticism but found a mediation effect for anxiety (the facet of Neuroticism most strongly associated with grip strength). Study 2 (N = 504) predicted and replicated this mediation effect. Further, sex differences in anxiety were serially mediated by grip strength and self-perceived formidability. These findings add to a nascent literature suggesting that differences in physical attributes may partially explain sex differences in personality.

Keywords: anxiety, Neuroticism, personality, sex differences, physical strength, formidability, open data, open materials, preregistered

General Discussion

In two studies, grip strength negatively predicted anxiety, and sex differences in anxiety were serially mediated by grip strength and self-perceived formidability. These findings suggest that some sex-based variation in personality may be partly attributable to variation in physical attributes.

These results suggest the testable hypothesis that other psychological and behavioral sex differences could be partly explained by differences in physical attributes. For example, there is evidence that social dominance and aggression—both of which tend to be higher in men—also covary intrasexually with physical strength (Farrington, 1989; Gallup et al., 2007; Price et al., 2011). Future research might investigate whether these and other psychological sex differences can be partly explained by differences in strength or stature.

Important limitations of this work should be noted. First, within-sex associations between strength and anxiety were small and somewhat inconsistent, and sex still accounted for some variance in anxiety beyond that explained by physical strength. Imperfect measurement of the key variables may have contributed to the small effects observed (see the Supplemental Material). Another possible explanation for the small within-sex effects is that the measures of strength and formidability employed here acted as a proxy for another variable, such as health or attractiveness (which both covary with grip strength; see Gallup & Fink, 2018). Although we cannot rule out this explanation, analyses reported in the Supplemental Material found relationships to be robust when controlling for several potential confounds, including body mass index, age, and a measure of self-perceived attractiveness. Similarly, though, these effects could be explained by a common underlying physiological factor, such as developmental testosterone levels (testosterone levels correlate negatively with anxiety in both sexes; see McHenry et al., 2014). Finally, a key limitation relating to the causal interpretation of these findings is that the mediational models presented here use cross-sectional data and cannot alone demonstrate causality. Thus, although the data here are consistent with the hypothesis that lower physical strength leads to higher anxiety, we cannot rule out alternative causal explanations.

Further, several additional questions remain unanswered. Is the association between strength and anxiety best explained by developmental calibration (i.e., people adapting behaviors to their strengths and weaknesses), genetic pleiotropy (i.e., genes associated with physical formidability also being associated with lower dispositional anxiety; see Lukaszewski & Roney, 2011), or facultative epigenetic processes whereby methylation of genes associated with strength also has consequences for anxiety? And, importantly, will these relationships generalize to other cultures, and would effects be larger for cultures and populations in which formidability is a more functional part of social life? Although these and other questions must be addressed in future research, the studies presented here support the hypothesis that sex differences in anxiety can be partly explained by differences in physical strength and self-perceived formidability. These findings suggest that further work on sex differences in personality may benefit from an increased focus on the role of physical attributes.

Honor cultures research centered almost exclusively on men and physical aggression as a means of reputation defense; present research indicates honor endorsing women also active in reputation maintenance and defense (spreading rumors, social exclusion)

Honor-endorsing women and relational aggression: Evidence for the presence of feminine aggression norms in southern U.S. women. Stephen Foster et al. Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 194, August 2022, 111668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111668

Highlights

• Culture of honor research has failed to focus on female-centric aspects of the culture.

• It is expected that women may engage in relationally-aggressive behavior to defend one's reputation.

• Relationally-aggressive reputation defense only emerges when honor-endorsing women do not fulfill honor norms and values.

• Provides first evidence for feminine aggression norms.

Abstract: Research on honor cultures has centered almost exclusively on men and men's use of physical aggression as a means of reputation defense, while tacitly overlooking women's role(s). Across three studies (N = 813), we examined whether honor endorsing women, like men, exhibit aggressive tendencies, albeit in the form of relational aggression. We found that women's honor endorsement predicted greater use of reactive relational aggression (e.g., ignoring and excluding others; Studies 1 and 2), but only among women who felt they were not achieving what it means to be an honorable woman (Study 2). Lastly, we found that women higher in feminine honor endorsement were more supportive of women who relationally aggressed (i.e. spreading rumors, social exclusion) in response to reputation threats (Study 3). Taken together, the present research indicates that honor endorsing women are more active in reputation maintenance and defense than prior work has acknowledged.

Keywords: Culture of honorFeminine normsRelational aggressionAggression

Higher levels of perceived tightness in own jurisdiction were associated with higher levels of mask wearing & handwashing during COVID-19, more endorsement of future policy changes to contain the pandemic, higher reported feelings of responsibility for one’s life

Does State Tightness-Looseness Predict Behavior and Attitudes Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic in the USA? Ashley Gilliam et al. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 30, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221077710

Abstract: We investigated how tightness-looseness, reflecting strictness of social norms, of state of residence in the USA predicts behaviors and attitudes related to COVID-19. Because individual-level tightness may better capture current attitudes during the pandemic, whereas state-level archival measures reflect historical factors, we assessed the extent to which tightness-looseness at both levels predicted adherence to public health guidelines and biases toward outgroups related to COVID-19. In Spring 2020, 544 mTurk participants, primarily from the 13 tightest and 13 loosest states, completed survey questions about health behaviors in response to COVID-19, endorsement of future policy changes, feeling of responsibility for lives, and attitudes toward groups marginalized during the pandemic (i.e., Asians, older adults). State-level results indicated some associations with attitudes toward Asians and older adults, but effects were not robust. Results based on individuals’ ratings of the tightness of their state indicated that higher levels of perceived tightness were associated with higher levels of protective self-reported public health behaviors (e.g., mask wearing, handwashing) during COVID-19, more endorsement of future policy changes to contain the pandemic, higher reported feelings of responsibility for one’s life, and stronger negative attitudes toward Asians. The relations between tightness and health outcomes persisted after controlling for political attitudes and demographics. Thus, individual, more than state, tightness-looseness accounted for some degree of public health behaviors (unique contribution of individual tightness: R2 = .034) and attitudes toward marginalized groups (R2 = .020) early during the COVID-19 pandemic. The implications of these findings for interventions to support behavior change or combat anti-Asian bias are discussed.

Keywords: COVID-19, culture, behavior change, attitudes, outgroup

Hunter-Gatherer Children’s Object Play and Tool Use: An Ethnohistorical Analysis

Hunter-Gatherer Children’s Object Play and Tool Use: An Ethnohistorical Analysis. Sheina Lew-Levy et al. Front. Psychol., May 11 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.824983

Abstract: Learning to use, make, and modify tools is key to our species’ success. Researchers have hypothesized that play with objects may have a foundational role in the ontogeny of tool use and, over evolutionary timescales, in cumulative technological innovation. Yet, there are few systematic studies investigating children’s interactions with objects outside the post-industrialized West. Here, we survey the ethnohistorical record to uncover cross-cultural trends regarding hunter-gatherer children’s use of objects during play and instrumental activities. Our dataset, consisting of 434 observations of children’s toys and tools from 54 hunter-gatherer societies, reveals several salient trends: Most objects in our dataset are used in play. Children readily manufacture their own toys, such as dolls and shelters. Most of the objects that children interact with are constructed from multiple materials. Most of the objects in our dataset are full-sized or miniature versions of adult tools, reflecting learning for adult roles. Children also engage with objects related to child culture, primarily during play. Taken together, our findings show that hunter-gatherer children grow up playing, making, and learning with objects.

Discussion

Learning to make and use tools is central to our species’ success. Many features of object play—including non-functional non-stereotypical actions, and joint social engagement—have been hypothesized to help children efficiently develop physical, cognitive, and social skills needed to make, modify, and use tools (Smith, 1982; Bjorklund and Gardiner, 2011; Bateson and Martin, 2013; Solis et al., 2017). In the present paper, we took an ethnohistorical approach to exploring object play and use in hunter-gatherer societies. In doing so, we help shed light on how objects are incorporated into the everyday lives of children outside the post-industrialized West. In what follows, we relate our findings to current research on play across cultures and discuss emerging research questions.

Most objects in our dataset were used in play. This finding echoes those from observational studies, which show that play makes up a large proportion of hunter-gatherer children’s time budgets, and that children incorporate many objects manufactured by themselves or others, as well as raw materials, into their play (e.g., Boyette, 2016; Froehle et al., 2019; Salali et al., 2019; Lew-Levy et al., 2020a). It is important to note that in some cases, children may engage in activities that are simultaneously playful and instrumental (see also Crittenden, 2016). For example, children may engage in target practice with the goal of improving their hunting skill, even if they do so during a game with peers. Similarly, children engage in instrumental activities in the service of play by making their own toys. Much of this nuance is lost in our coding scheme, partially because we have opted to use binary coding to simplify analyses, and partially because it is often not possible to identify children’s own goals via ethnographer descriptions. Nonetheless, these findings raise the possibility that children may be proficient at using a variety of objects to meet both playful and instrumental goals.

Children were more likely to engage with objects socially during play than during instrumental activities. Such social object play may be an important avenue for observing and imitating others, receiving teaching, learning about cultural norms such as sharing, and for innovating with peers (Bakeman et al., 1990; MacDonald, 2007; Imamura and Akiyama, 2016; Lew-Levy et al., 2017, 2020b,2021). Children were also more likely to use safe objects while in play than while in instrumental activities. Many ethnographers note that children in hunter-gatherer societies are free to play with dangerous objects (see Lancy, 2016 for review). Our findings support these observations: our dataset includes several examples of children engaging in play with risky objects such as knives, canoes, or stilts. Play with risky objects may have developmental benefits by helping children master age-appropriate challenges (Sandseter and Kennair, 2011). Further, play contexts may be created such that risk, including object-related risk, is minimised (Gopnik, 2020). Nonetheless, our findings suggest that children use relatively less risky objects when in play than when engaging in instrumental activities. This may be because some risky objects, such as knives and bows, are more instrumental in nature and thus, might invite more instrumental activities.

We found that many of the objects used by children were full-sized or miniature versions of adult tools, and that a majority of children’s objects were composite in nature, overall reflecting the observed complexity of adult material culture across societies (Boyd et al., 2013; Sterelny, 2021). Miniature or full-sized versions of adult objects may help children learn about adult roles and activities as well as object affordances (Riede et al., 2018). Further, adult objects were more likely to be used during instrumental than play activities, reflecting their functional nature. This finding echoes ethnographic studies which demonstrate that children learn through participation across a range of cultural contexts (Lancy, 2012; Rogoff, 2014; Lew-Levy et al., 2019). In contrast, objects reportedly used by children only such as dolls, figures, and games, were overwhelmingly used in play. Engaging with child culture artifacts during play may facilitate the acquisition of child-specific ecological knowledge (Gallois et al., 2017), the retention of technologies which have been abandoned by adults (Imamura, 2016), and the development of strong social ties with their peers (Corsaro and Eder, 1990). Some objects may facilitate learning about both future adult roles and peer cultures. For example, while they are not scaled-down tools, dolls nonetheless commonly represent babies. By making and playing with dolls, children may simultaneously learn about object affordances, practice adult social roles, and reinterpret adult culture to meet the concerns of their peer world (Corsaro, 1993; Edwards, 2000).

There were no gender differences in objects used in play vs. instrumental activities, reflecting findings from time allocation studies on the topic in hunter-gatherer societies (Boyette, 2016; Lew-Levy et al., 2020a). Boys were more likely to use risky objects, which may echo cross-cultural findings regarding gender differences in risk taking (Apicella et al., 2017). Our results regarding age were imprecise and hence inconclusive, largely because few ethnographers provided enough detail to confidently attribute age categories to object users, resulting in most user ages being categorized as “unknown.” Tentatively, however, our results suggest that children in middle childhood and adolescence (i.e., seven years or over) were more likely to use objects during play and more likely than infants and children in early childhood (i.e., six years or younger) to use risky objects, suggesting that children’s use of objects becomes more varied with age. Note that the increased use of risky objects with age need not signify actual increased risk in object use; this could be an expression of older children having acquired the necessary skill to wield risky objects safely.

Our study has several limitations. We had few observations for precise age categories, limiting our ability to infer developmental trends in object play and use. In the case of object complexity, values were not missing completely at random, but instead are biased toward missing values for girls. Gender differences related to complexity should thus be interpreted cautiously. By focusing on inanimate objects, we have overlooked how children play with babies and animals, the form and learning function of which may share similarities with some forms of object play. The records included within eHRAF reflect biases inherent to the ethnohistoric literature: virtually all ethnographers were adults, and most were men. In addition, all observations were made before the full advent of interest in children as culture-bearers and prior to the emergence of systematic studies in this domain. As a result, many aspects of children’s activities may be less systematically recorded compared to other aspects of culture. In addition, eHRAF is known for its bias toward North America. While it does represent the single best source for comparative cross-cultural analysis, and while we used statistical methods to overcome such biases, the sample’s representativity in the strict sense cannot be claimed. Finally, the present study used binary coding of variables of interest to facilitate analysis and because ethnographer descriptions often lacked the details necessary for more continuous coding (e.g., ratings). We acknowledge that this approach obscures much of the nuance inherent to children’s activities, and indeed, human behavior more generally.

Despite these caveats, our descriptive study points to several new avenues of research which can help further our understanding regarding the learning function of object play across individuals and societies. First, many experimental studies examine how children’s play with raw materials (e.g., clamps, sticks, pipe cleaners) contributes to their ability to modify and recombine these into functional tools. However, these tasks often represent ill-structured problems in the sense that children lack information about the transformations needed to accomplish the desired end goal (Cutting et al., 2011). Our data suggests that in contrast to playing with component pieces, hunter-gatherer children often play with composite objects. By engaging with the end-state first, children may more easily come to understand the functional properties of component pieces, and thus, may more easily apply their knowledge to tool selection and modification tasks (Cutting et al., 2014; Riede et al., 2018). Some experimental studies investigating the learning function for play also focus on children’s solo play with objects. However, our findings suggest that most play with objects occurs socially. Developmental research has long demonstrated that collaborative learning bolsters children’s ability to solve novel tasks (Azmitia, 1988; Perlmutter et al., 1989; Rendell et al., 2011) and their logical reasoning skills (Tomasello et al., 1993; Kruger and Tomasello, 1996). Such socio-cognitive capabilities may also be central to children’s ability to make and innovate tools (Gönül et al., 2019; Lew-Levy et al., 2021). Next, most experimental research on object play focuses on deferred functions related to tool use and tool making skill. However, our findings hint at the possibility that playing with objects may more immediately have a central role in the development and maintenance of peer cultures. Finally, if object play contributes to the development of problem solving skills, then the diversity and complexity of children’s play objects should covary with that of adult toolkits (Riede et al., 2018). Testing this possibility requires careful attention to potential confounds such as environmental risk, population size, raw material availability, and subsistence strategy (Kline and Boyd, 2010; Collard et al., 2013). We are in the process of expanding our dataset to include these variables in the hopes of further investigating how children’s learning through object play contributes to the observed cross-cultural variation in material culture. Such analyses will help shed new light on how object play and play object provisioning may have bolstered technological innovation in the past.

Letters To A Spanish Youngster CCXLI

Letters To A Spanish Youngster CCXLI

[...]

Your Honor of the great fire in the heart,

L'amour, la tendresse, la gratitude que j'ai pour toi,* dear human but also archangelical being, are so big that sometimes I feel "desamparé... sans direction"*.

I remember well my anguish every day after losing sight of You when You were at my company's headquarters, high priestess... The writer said*:

Chaque foi que je te quitte, j'ai une angoisse et un tremblement au fond du coeur. Où es-tu ? Où es-tu, mon amour ? Tu m'attends, n'est-ce pas, comme je t'aatends, avec la même forte et longue fidélité, avec crainte et certitude.

[Every time that I leave you, I have an anguish and feel a tremor at the bottom of my heart. Where are you ? Where are you, my love ? You are waiting for me, aren't you, as I am waiting for you, with the same strong and consistent loyalty, with fear and certainty.]

At times, Tout cela est stupide et n'a aucun sens* (all is stupid and have no sense), dear master and absolute governor. To lose You, to have no access to Your grace, Your Grace, is really unfortunate and hurtful. If only You could write to me! [Vous] ne peux pas savoir le bonheur que m'apporte la chère écriture.* (You cannot know the happiness that the dear writing provides me with.)

You, mystical person of the highest qualities, are so high in the hierarchy of human beings, that I cannot say, as the writer said, "avec toutes nos différences, nous sommes si semblables, si fraternels et si complices (au beau sense du mot)"*. On the contrary, we are really different, and very distant in the cosmic order.

Even with this belief, is it possible que nou pouissons enfin nous appuyer l'un sur l'autre, vraiment ! Il me semble qu'alors il n'y aurait pas de limite à mes forces. Et, pour tout ce que je veux faire, j'ai besoin de forces sans limites (we may finally be able to lean on each other, really! It seems to me that then there would be no limit to my strength. And, for everything I want to do, I need strength with no limits.)*

After re-reading this last paragraph, I think it is applicable to me what Camus wrote, who said to his beloved*:

Tu vois, je suis un incorrigible imbécile. [You see, I am an incorrigible idiot],

:-)

My person of the ҉ incomprehensibly wonderful members, incapable of being grasped with the mind, hard even to look on ҉ ,** despite the years already passed I cannot forget Your divine voice, graceful movements, & treatment of the others.

Of course the memories fade :-( , and have no longer Your sacred words and laughter in a part of my brain from which to recall them with ease, but even so, I feel at times I am right next to that secret temple where encapsulated in gold we Your sad followers could find the vibrations of air that You uttered so much time ago. :-)

Your spiritual attributes were so magical, Your Honor, that at times it seems to me that just with a bit more effort I could recover those air waves stored in the hidden shrine and hear Your voice again, as if time didn't pass.

But what I am saying? Obviously je suis désorienté, bizarrement inapte, incapable de rien faire (I'm disoriented, unfit in an indescribable way, unable to do anything)*. In great part is my not having Your light in my life.

In other part, I am sure that endogenous reasons would make me suffer all the same, even if having everything I needed or wanted. Even if You paid attention to me, my frail nature would be the source of sufferings.

---

In the human nature department, I wanted to share with You, my lord, these newspieces... Beyond what is diffcult to know and needs lots of work (learning about our hospital surviving rates for surgery and illnesses), we focus in the easy to process, things like how warm are the nurses, or having hotel-like rooms†:

Abstract: Consumer-driven health care is often heralded as a new quality paradigm in medicine. However, patients-as-consumers face difficulties in judging the quality of their medical treatment. With a sample of 3,000 U.S. hospitals, we find that neither medical quality nor patient survival rates have much impact on patient satisfaction with their hospital. In contrast, patients are very sensitive to the “room and board” aspects of care that are highly visible. Quiet rooms have a larger impact on patient satisfaction than medical quality, and communication with nurses affects satisfaction far more than the hospital-level risk of dying. Hospitality experiences create a halo effect of patient goodwill, while medical excellence and patient safety do not. Moreover, when hospitals face greater competition from other hospitals, patient satisfaction is higher but medical quality is lower. Consumer-driven health care creates pressures for hospitals to be more like hotels. These findings lend broader insight into unintended consequences of marketization.

The second paper, summarized here, tells us that demagogues do not mobilize the unconvinced, but coordinate the already prone to resort to violence‡:

Abstract: Large-scale mobilization is often accompanied by the emergence of demagogic leaders and the circulation of unverified rumors, especially if the mobilization happens in support of violent or disruptive projects. In those circumstances, researchers and commentators frequently explain the mobilization as a result of mass manipulation. Against this view, evolutionary psychologists have provided evidence that human psychology contains mechanisms for avoiding manipulation and new studies suggest that political manipulation attempts are, in general, ineffective. Instead, we can understand decisions to follow demagogic leaders and circulate fringe rumors as attempts to solve a social problem inherent to mobilization processes: The coordination problem. Essentially, these decisions reflect attempts to align the attention of individuals already disposed for conflict.

To close this letter, friend of the beautiful, and the honest, and of what is good, I wish to show You some of what Don Denis of Portugal wrote to his lady. Just a common case of unrequited love֍:

Prazmi a mí, senhor, de morrer,                   [Pláceme a mí, senhor, morir,

e prazm’ ende por vosso mal,                       y pláceme también por vuestro mal,

ca sei que sentiredes qual                            que sé que sentiréis tal

mingua vós, pois ei de fazer,                        mengua vos (pues así lo haré),

ca non perde pouco senhor                          porque no pierde poco la senhor                                      

quando perde tal servidor                             cuando pierde tal servidor

qual perdedes en me perder.                       como el que vos perdéis al perderme.

E con mia mort’ ei eu prazer,                       Y con mi muerte tengo yo placer,                                        

porque sei que vos farei tal                           porque sé que a vos haré tal                                     

mingua qual fez omen leal,                           mengua, como la de un hombre leal,

o máis que podia seer                                  todo lo más que se puede ser

a quen ama, pois morto for,                          por quien se ama, hasta la muerte,

e fostes vós mui sabedor                              porque supisteis vos 

d’ eu por vós atal mort’ aver.                         que yo por vos tal muerte tendría.

E pero que ei de sofrer                                 Y ya que he de sufrir

a morte mui descomunal                              una muerte tan descomunal,

con mia mort’ oimais non m’ én cal,             con mi muerte desde hoy nada me importará,

por quanto vos quero dizer                           y por eso os quiero decir

ca meu serviç’ e meu amor                           que mi servicio y mi amor

seravos d’ escusar peior                               serán a vos de excusar peor

que a min d’ escusar viver.                           que a mí de excusar vivir.

E certo podedes saber                                 Y ciertamente, podéis saber

que pero s’ o meu tempo sal                        que ya que mi tiempo se acaba

per morte, non á ja i al                                  por la muerte, y ya nada importa,

que me non quer’ end’ eu doer,                    y no me quiero de ello doler,

porque a vós farei maior                               porque a vos haré mayor

mingua que fez Nostro Senhor                     mengua que la que hizo Nuestro Señor

de vassal’ a senhor prender.                        cuando a este vasallo arrancó de su senhor.]

(senhor = the lady)

Rien, rien n'a plus de sens pour moi, Your Honor... Je ne sais plus vivre.* Yours faithfully

a. r. ante Su Señoría

--

Notes

* Albert Camus & Maria Casarès's Correspondance. Paris: Gallimard, 2017. Page 109; 109; 103; 97; 96; 92; 92; 92; 89; 98.

** enūma eliš ("When Above," or "The Marduk Exaltation Poem," or "The Babylonian Creation Epic"), tablet I, adapted from the ETANA webpage, digital version at http://www.etana.org/node/581.

† Patients as Consumers in the Market for Medicine: The Halo Effect of Hospitality. Cristobal Young, Xinxiang Chen. Social Forces, soaa007, February 13 2020, https://www.bipartisanalliance.com/2020/02/quiet-rooms-have-larger-impact-on.html

‡ The Evolutionary Psychology of Mass Mobilization: How Disinformation and Demagogues Coordinate Rather Than Manipulate. Michael Bang Petersen. Current Opinion in Psychology, February 20 2020. https://www.bipartisanalliance.com/2020/02/we-got-psychological-defenses-against.html

Highlights

• Violent mobilization is often attributed to manipulation from, for example, demagogues.

• The human mind contains psychological defenses against manipulation, also in politics.

• Mass mobilization requires that the attention of group members is coordinated.

• Demagogues and disinformation can be explained as tools for achieving coordination.

• Mobilized individuals are predisposed for conflict rather than manipulated into conflict.

֍ Adapted from María Gimena del Rio Riande's Cantigas del rey Don Denis. In "Un libro oscuro. 105 poemas negros". Buenos Aires: Bajo la luna, 2012. https://www.aacademica.org/gimena.delrio.riande/135

In aged mice, the kinds of memory problems common in old age can be reversed, and all it takes is some cerebrospinal fluid harvested from the young

Young CSF restores oligodendrogenesis and memory in aged mice via Fgf17. Tal Iram et al. Nature May 11 2022. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04722-0

Abstract: Recent understanding of how the systemic environment shapes the brain throughout life has led to numerous intervention strategies to slow brain ageing1,2,3. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) makes up the immediate environment of brain cells, providing them with nourishing compounds4,5. We discovered that infusing young CSF directly into aged brains improves memory function. Unbiased transcriptome analysis of the hippocampus identified oligodendrocytes to be most responsive to this rejuvenated CSF environment. We further showed that young CSF boosts oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) proliferation and differentiation in the aged hippocampus and in primary OPC cultures. Using SLAMseq to metabolically label nascent mRNA, we identified serum response factor (SRF), a transcription factor that drives actin cytoskeleton rearrangement, as a mediator of OPC proliferation following exposure to young CSF. With age, SRF expression decreases in hippocampal OPCs, and the pathway is induced by acute injection with young CSF. We screened for potential SRF activators in CSF and found that fibroblast growth factor 17 (Fgf17) infusion is sufficient to induce OPC proliferation and long-term memory consolidation in aged mice while Fgf17 blockade impairs cognition in young mice. These findings demonstrate the rejuvenating power of young CSF and identify Fgf17 as a key target to restore oligodendrocyte function in the ageing brain.

Popular version, excerpts from Old Mice 'Rejuvenated' With Injections of Brain Fluid From The Young (sciencealert.com), by Jacinta Bowler:

While immortality might forever be out of reach, a long, healthy retirement is the stuff dreams are made of.

To that end, a recent study suggests that the kinds of memory problems common in old age can be reversed, and all it takes is some cerebrospinal fluid harvested from the young. In mice, at least.

If this is sounding a little familiar, you might be thinking of a similar series of studies done back in the mid-2010s, which found that older mice could be generally 'rejuvenated' with the blood of younger animals – both from humans and from mice. The FDA even had to warn people to stop doing it.

This new study instead examined the links between memory and cerebrospinal fluid fluid (CSF), and the results show considerable promise, even providing a mechanism for how it works, and highlighting a potential growth factor that could mimic the results.

"We know that CSF composition changes with age, and, in fact, these changes are used routinely in the clinic to assess brain health and disease biomarkers," Stanford University neurologist Tal Iram told ScienceAlert.

[...]

To investigate, the researchers, led by Iram, took older mice (between 18–22 months old) and gave them light shocks on the foot, at the same time as a tone and flashing light were activated. The mice were then split into groups, and either given young mouse CSF (from animals 10 weeks old) or artificial CSF.

[graphs]

In experiments like this, if the mice 'freeze' when they see the tone and light, it means they're remembering the foot shock, and are preparing for it to happen again.

In this study, three weeks after the foot shocks were conducted (which the team called "memory acquisition"), the researchers tested the mice, finding that the animals that had been given the CSF from young mice showed higher-than-average freezing rates, suggesting they had better memory.

This was followed up by a battery of other experiments to test the theory, which revealed that certain genes (that are different in young-versus-old CSF) could be used to get the same response. In other words, without needing to extract someone's brain fluid.

"When we took a deeper look into gene changes that occurred in the hippocampus (a region associated with memory and aging-related cognitive decline), we found, to our surprise, a strong signature of genes that belong to oligodendrocytes," Iram told ScienceAlert.

"Oligodendrocytes are unique because their progenitors are still present in vast numbers in the aged brain, but they are very slow in responding to cues that promote their differentiation. We found that when they are re-exposed to young CSF, they proliferate and produce more myelin in the hippocampus."

[graphs]

In the mice, an infusion of a fibroblast growth factor called FGF17 was able to boost oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in a similar way to the CSF injection.

Oligodendrocytes are particularly helpful because they produce myelin, a material that covers and insulates neuron fibers. The infusion of FGF17 was itself able to help the older mice increase memory ability.

While this field of research has a very very long way to go before we can use such insights to increase memory in older humans, the findings are exciting [...]

Serbian Roma: Girls were the preferred sex, owing to expected fitness benefits; Roma fathers tend to bias their investment towards taller, more endowed children, because of greater fitness pay-off

Paternal investment, stepfather presence and early child development and growth among Serbian Roma. Jelena Čvorović. Evolutionary Human Sciences, Vol 4, April 18 2022. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/evolutionary-human-sciences/article/paternal-investment-stepfather-presence-and-early-child-development-and-growth-among-serbian-roma/F3B5185E6333B85FEF0ACCFD5685FCA4

Abstract: Research on paternal investment and child growth and development is limited outside of high-income countries. Using nationally representative data from low-resource Serbian Roma communities, this study examined father investment (direct care), its predictors and the associations between paternal investment, stepfather presence and child physical growth and early development. The sample included 1222 children aged 35–59 months, out of which 235 were living with biological fathers. Child outcomes included height-for-age Z-scores, stunting and early child developmental score. Roma paternal investment was relatively low. There was a positive association of father investment and children's height, and no association with developmental score. The presence of father vs. stepfather did not exert any influence on children. Instead, maternal and child characteristics explained both the overall development and height for Roma children. Thus, older children, born to literate, lower parity mothers of higher status and greater investment had better developmental and growth outcomes; girls were the preferred sex, owing to expected fitness benefits. Reverse causality emerged as the most likely pathway through which the cross-sectional association of father direct care with child growth may manifest, such that Roma fathers tend to bias their investment towards taller, more endowed children, because of greater fitness pay-off.

Discussion

This paper used nationally representative data from Serbian Roma communities to assess paternal investment (as defined in this paper) and its predictors, and the associations between paternal investment, stepfather presence and early child development and physical growth.

There were several main findings. In this Roma sample, parental investment in a number of direct care behaviours was relatively low, while maternal and paternal investments were positively correlated. Overall, almost 10% of children did not receive any investment from their parents, as measured in the present study. In line with other studies from low- and middle-income countries, almost one-third of Roma fathers did not interact with their children in the surveyed care behaviours, twice the proportion of unengaged Roma mothers: 29.7 vs. 14.2% (Jeong et al., Reference Jeong, McCoy, Yousafzai, Salhi and Fink2016; Sun et al., Reference Sun, Liu, Chen, Rao and Liu2016). There was a cross-sectional association between father's investment with child's height and stunting, while maternal investment and child's height appeared to be predictors of father's investment. There were no associations between father's investment and developmental score, and stepfather vs. father presence and Roma children outcomes. Instead, maternal and child characteristics explained both the overall development and height for Roma children.

Parenting practices may be influenced by a range of child and family characteristics, and political and economic development (Walker et al., Reference Walker, Wachs, Grantham-McGregor, Black, Nelson, Huffman and Richter2011). In addition, local culture and traditions influence parenting behaviour: in many countries, childcare is culturally ‘mother centric’, with low participation from fathers (Hosegood & Madhavan, Reference Hosegood and Madhavan2010). Thus, for instance, an average Serbian father spends only 11 minutes per day with his children, while only one in 20 fathers is fully involved in parenting (Republički zavod za Statistiku, 2020). The observed low paternal investment of Roma fathers may reflect the prevailing dominant patriarchal cultural pattern with a significant sex asymmetry in parenting (Čvorović & Coe, Reference Čvorović and Coe2019). Additionally, bias in maternal reporting could account for this finding – studies have found that generally fathers tend to report significantly higher levels of involvement than mothers, contingent on numerous factors including ethnicity, the quality of the couple's relationship and the child characteristics (Charles et al., Reference Charles, Spielfogel, Gorman-Smith, Schoeny, Henry and Tolan2018).

Previous research found inconsistent relationships between father's direct care and children's height (Maselko et al., Reference Maselko, Hagaman, Bates, Bhalotra, Biroli, Gallis and Rahman2019; Jeong et al., Reference Jeong, McCoy, Yousafzai, Salhi and Fink2016), but in this study, after adjusting for potential confounding factors, Roma fathers’ direct care was positively associated with their children's height. Fathers may contribute to their offspring's well-being in a number of ways: additive paternal care (‘cooperative care’ where both parents work together to care for children at the same time) can include complementing the mother's direct care or providing resources that allow for better nutrition (Gurven et al., Reference Gurven, Winking, Kaplan, von Rueden and McAllister2009). Additive care may also include playing with a child or teaching (Starkweather et al., Reference Starkweather, Keith, Prall, Alam, Zohora and Emery Thompson2021). Paternal additive direct care may have similar impact to that of other allomothers: a child may receive a better overall gain and additive investments that thus could lead to better fitness outcomes (Emmott & Page, Reference Emmott, Page, Shackelford, A and Weekes-Shackelford2019). Given the positive correlation of Roma maternal and paternal investment, the overall investment may have positively affected children, resulting in better outcomes. However, the most obvious mode that paternal direct care can influence growth is via nutrition, i.e. feeding. MICS is cross-sectional in design, and measures of direct parental involvement did not include feeding practices, thus the results may be confounded by an unmeasured variable that correlates with paternal care. In this setting, another possible pathway that may reflect on the positive association between father investment and child height is reverse causality, such that fathers provided more care to taller/healthier children (Maselko et al., Reference Maselko, Hagaman, Bates, Bhalotra, Biroli, Gallis and Rahman2019). A Roma child's height, in addition to maternal investment, predicted father's investment: taller children had fathers who provided more direct care. In young children, height serves as a proxy for the cumulative effect of nutritional and health loads from conception (Frongillio et al., Reference Frongillo, Kulkarni, Basnet and de Castro2017). Thus, early childhood growth is an important measure of offspring quality, as it may influence future health and reproduction (Kramer et al., Reference Kramer, Veile and Otárola-Castillo2016).

Additionally, Roma child's height and the chances of stunting were influenced by the child's sex: Roma boys were more likely to be shorter and stunted than Roma girls, suggesting that they were more susceptible to nutritional inequalities than their girl counterparts of the same age. This pattern is consistent with previous findings where biased paternal investment was associated with the children's health/height but also sex (Alvergne et al., Reference Alvergne, Faurie and Raymond2009; Čvorović, Reference Čvorović2020a; Hagen et al., Reference Hagen, Hames, Craig, Lauer and Price2001). Among the Roma, parents may selectively invest in and support taller children (girls) who had the greatest potential to survive into adulthood and reproduce successfully, thus making the parents into grandparents, or in other words, enhancing the parents’ reproductive success (Čvorović, Reference Čvorović2020a). Sex preferencing among the Roma in favouring girls is a common finding in Hungarian Roma groups as well (Bereczkei & Dunbar, Reference Bereczkei and Dunbar2002). Roma girls more often than boys engage in helping-at-the-nest, have a greater chance of marrying up the socio-economic scale and produce more surviving children compared with sons. In addition, having a high-quality (taller/healthier) daughter is regarded as a considerable advantage and a source of income among Serbian Roma who practice bride price (Čvorović, Reference Čvorović2014).

Compared with other studies, where socioeconomic status and parental education were positively associated with early child development (Urke et al., Reference Urke, Contreras and Matanda2018; Jeong et al., Reference Jeong, McCoy and Fink2017; Paxson & Schady, Reference Paxson and Schady2010), in this setting, there was an apparent lack of relationship between child developmental score and also four domains of development (literacy–numeracy, physical, socioemotional and learning) with paternal investment and other variables.

In contrast to other studies, when a stepfather was introduced to the context, the presence of either father or stepfather had no influence on Roma children outcomes (Case & Paxson, Reference Case and Paxson2001). Instead, child's age and maternal characteristics explained both the height and overall development for Roma children. Thus, older children were taller and had higher developmental score. Older children have higher reproductive value, and in poor populations, the later born children are often disadvantaged relative to earlier borns in nutritional status and growth, having higher morbidity and mortality (Lawson & Mace, Reference Lawson and Mace2009). In addition, maternal parity was negatively associated with child's height. Roma mothers with higher parity had children who were shorter than those of mothers with lower parity. Under poor conditions, numerous siblings may put children at higher risk of malnutrition, because of the discrepancy between family size and available resources. Maternal parity may also serve as a rough measure for investment: body size may be a proxy for a trade-off between offspring number and quality, or between the number and size of offspring, especially under resource-scarce conditions and in high-fertility settings such as with the Roma (Walker et al., Reference Walker, Gurven, Burger and Hamilton2008). Maternal parity was higher in stepfather households, but interestingly, unlike in other studies (Amato & Rivera, Reference Amato and Rivera1999; Lawson & Mace, Reference Lawson and Mace2009), maternal investment was higher for children living with stepfathers. One possible explanation as of why children living with stepfathers experience higher maternal investment may be that a stepfather is providing some extra resources, thus the mother may be experiencing a higher quality of life in this new relationship, both of which enable the mother to better provide for her children, including direct care. MICS does not include information on stepfathers’ resources, while maternal age, basic literacy skills and access to improved sanitation (as proxies for socioeconomic status) did not differ between mothers living with biological fathers vs. stepfathers. A more likely explanation is that Roma mothers in stepfather households may be compensating for the absence of a biological father by focusing more investment and attention on the children from former unions (Emmot & Mace, Reference Emmott and Mace2014). Higher investment and more attention could also serve as protection for any number of possible negative effects in the new home. This context could perhaps explain the lack of association of maternal and paternal characteristics and child development and maternal characteristics and child height: the poor conditions may have affected the ability of Roma parents to invest, and to make substantially enough investment to be detected or differentiate between children. Thus, mothers ‘get activated’ only in the presence of stepfathers (high risk), to protect their children and compensate for even the limited paternal investment. Roma children may be sensitive to this particular setting as well: child's age was associated with growth and development only in the stepfather's presence, thus younger and older sibling get to compete more in a stepfather's household, as there is an actual maternal investment to compete for.

Furthermore, maternal age was positively associated with both height and development: generally, older mothers tend to invest more in offspring, as they are less likely to have additional children and the investment focuses on the children they already have (Uggla & Mace, Reference Uggla and Mace2016). An additional explanation could be that this relationship reflects on maternal status within a family. Many Roma women face inflexible gender roles and expectations, and for many, having children in marriage is the only socially endorsed route for an improvement in status (Čvorović & Coe, Reference Čvorović and Coe2019). A higher maternal status within a Roma family may include more power in decision-making concerning child's wellbeing such as diet and activities.

Additionally, there was a positive association of child's age, maternal investment, and literacy with children's overall developmental score. As a child ages, it is more likely to develop and learn skills and be ahead in development. The importance of maternal care behaviours and education for children's early development has been well described: parental support for learning (such as stimulating interactions and reading books) was found to be an important means through which parental education is associated with children's development (Sun et al., Reference Sun, Liu, Chen, Rao and Liu2016; Jeong et al., Reference Jeong, McCoy and Fink2017; Walker et al., Reference Walker, Wachs, Grantham-McGregor, Black, Nelson, Huffman and Richter2011). In turn, maternal education can facilitate maternal investment and practices, as increasing levels of education lead to different thinking and decision-making patterns (Cutler & Lleras-Muney, Reference Cutler and Lleras-Muney2010). This may be especially important to the Roma, given the high illiteracy rate among females: even low levels of education increase children's well-being and survival prospects (Sandiford et al., Reference Sandiford, Cassel, Sanchez and Coldham1997; Čvorović, Reference Čvorović2020a).

To the best of my knowledge, this is the first study to provide an account of paternal direct care as a proxy for investment, stepfather presence and child development and growth among the low-resource Roma. The study findings contribute new evidence of the drivers or lack of it of development and growth among children in marginalised ethnic populations, adding to the literature about paternal investment and child outcomes.

The majority of Roma children grow up in poverty, born to mothers with low education, and in homes with limited learning opportunities. In this context, parental investment was relatively low. Fathers have limited involvement in direct care of their young children and this involvement was not associated with child development. The presence of a father vs. a stepfather did not exert any influence on Roma children, insomuch as it did not have direct influence on the children's’ outcomes of growth and development. Roma paternal investment was low to begin with and father absence is likely to be less important in settings where fathers usually provide less support for their children (Lawson et al., Reference Lawson, Schaffnit, Hassan, Ngadaya, Ngowi, Mfinanga and Borgerhoff Mulder2017). In the presence of a stepfather, maternal and child's traits explained overall child development and growth. Maternal investment was higher for children living with stepfathers, thus mothers may be protecting their children from previous unions and compensating for paternal absence. Competition among Roma children – among younger and older siblings – was evident only when maternal investment was significant, in the presence of a stepfather. Thus, older children, born to literate, lower parity mothers of higher status and greater investment had better developmental and growth outcomes; girls were the preferred sex, as they were likely to be taller and less stunted than Roma boys, possibly owing to expected fitness benefits. Reverse causality emerged as the most likely pathway through which the cross-sectional, positive association of father direct care with child growth may manifest, such that Roma fathers tend to bias their investment towards taller, more endowed children, because of greater fitness pay-off.

The study had several limitations. The data were cross-sectional, limiting causal inferences between the variables under study. The developmental score and paternal investment were mother-reported and thus subject to biases: both measure how mothers perceived their child's development and their husbands’ involvement, and not actual child development and paternal behaviour. Furthermore, the reliability of Early Child Development scale was fair but similar to other recent studies, reflecting its limited adaptation to local culture and context (Urke et al., Reference Urke, Contreras and Matanda2018; McCoy et al., Reference McCoy, Sudfeld, Bellinger, Muhihi, Ashery, Weary and Fink2017). The questions regarding literacy/numeracy have been shown to be too advanced for 3- and 4-year-old children (McCoy et al., Reference McCoy, Peet, Ezzati, Danaei, Black, Sudfeld and Fink2016), this being particularly pertinent as regards Roma and other disadvantaged children where parental literacy is limited.

Additionally, to date, no specific growth references have been developed for the Roma, even though their Indian origin indicate an ethnicity impact to the anthropometric measures. Albeit the population-specific growth references may serve as a more biologically relevant measure of within-population assessment of children's growth (Kramer et al., Reference Kramer, Veile and Otárola-Castillo2016; Martin et al., Reference Martin, Blackwell, Kaplan and Gurven2019), the effects found in this study may be considerable, ranging from an approximately 0.33 SD in child's height to a more than 1 SD difference in paternal care (Winking & Koster Reference Winking and Koster2015).

As child's growth and development are sensitive to available resources, and may be affected by aspects outside of direct family influence (Lawson et al., Reference Lawson, Schaffnit, Hassan, Ngadaya, Ngowi, Mfinanga and Borgerhoff Mulder2017; Winking & Koster, Reference Winking and Koster2015), social assistance (cash transfers) may also have an effect on Roma family, including the growth and development of Roma children. For instance, in affluent settings, fathers tend to engage more in direct child care if their wives are employed and/or contribute a greater share of the couple's earnings (Raley et al., Reference Raley, Bianchi and Wang2012). Roma mothers’ receipt of welfare could motivate Roma fathers to engage in direct child care: the majority of Roma women do not work (formal income leads to withdrawal of social benefits), but still support the family with cash transfers. Nevertheless, a recent study found that among Serbian Roma, receiving social assistance was associated with disintegration and a diminished role of the family (Čvorović & Vojinović, Reference Čvorović and Vojinović2020), but whether welfare influence father–child relationships and child outcomes remains unexplored. Also, other potential confounders, such as parental height and health status, were not collected. To fully understand the effects of paternal investment on child outcomes, information should be collected directly from fathers and father-like figures and/or through observation, and include parental anthropometrics, as well as data on the presence of alloparents, which may have an effect on child outcomes, including growth (Sear & Mace, Reference Sear and Mace2008).